Adaptation to climate change may redress, perpetuate, or create social injustices. While stakeholders agree that adaptation should be just, they disagree on how justice should be defined or pursued. This talk will describe several ongoing projects related to adaptation justice in the context of relocation as an adaptation strategy. This includes a critical assessment of gaps between justice theory and adaptation practice, including the difficulty in allocating resources that cause simultaneous harm and benefit; a case study of how adaptation administrator values create conflicts and inequities; a critique of voluntariness as a universal good; and a discussion of why efforts to predict future climate relocation may perpetuate injustices.