The Charles and Lousie Travers Department of Political Science will be hosting Angela Gutierrez for their RWAP Colloquium. She will be speaking about her new paper, see title above, which examines the rise of a politicized Latino identity as measured by group consciousness in California during the 1990s. The finding suggests that perceived discrimination may activate group consciousness and have long-lasting effects in promoting group identity long after feelings of threat have subsided.
| January 29, 2020 | 12:00 – 1:30 PM | UC Berkeley 119 Moses Hall |More Information| Read their Paper
Are you a current UW Student interested in High Performance Research Computing? Not only, but *especially* if you are using R, you should consider joining the UW Research Computing Club. There are cloud credits and the UW Hyak supercomputer available to you. Please see this site for more information and contact: https://depts.washington.edu/uwrcc/
The Student Technology fee pays for a great many Student nodes in the Hyak cluster – please use them!
The UWRCC is having its first meeting on 1/28/2020
In this workshop, there will be:
- Introductions and discussion of importance of mentoring, mentoring team structures, resources from UCSF CTSI mentoring program.
- Introduction to Goleman’s leadership styles and how they apply to mentoring.
- Role play of leadership styles with problem mentee.
Mentoring consultation clinic (2 parallel clinics, 5-7 mentors each).
Register by 2/14!
Speaker: Monica Gandhi, MD, MPH
Monica Gandhi is a Professor of Medicine, Associate Chief in the Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, and Director of the CFAR at UCSF. Research efforts have focused on HIV/AIDS in U.S. women and investigating objective methods to measure antiretroviral adherence and exposure in HIV treatment and prevention settings. Recent work has expanded to measuring adherence to anti-TB drugs in the context of latent and active TB infection. Dr. Gandhi also has an interest in HIV education and mentorship.
Departmental nominations for the Alvord Graduate Fellowship in the Humanities has started. This endowed fellowship was established through the generous gift of Ellsworth and Nancy Alvord and matched by State funds. The terms of the Alvord Endowment specify that selection must be based on academic merit, with secondary consideration of financial need, from among graduate student in any humanities discipline*.
Every effort will be made to assure diversity among the disciplines represented by the recipients, and priority will be given to those nominees whose scholarly and research interests cross disciplinary lines. The competition is open to any student who has completed the M. A. degree, or equivalent in programs with no required degree preceding the Ph.D.
This year we will be able to award one $25,000 fellowship (includes GSA benefits) for 2020-21, effective September 16, 2020 – June 15, 2021. In addition, the Graduate School has again generously committed to providing a tuition waiver for the Alvord Fellow. See the attached call for proposal document for more details.
Each department is limited to ONE nomination. A nomination packet must include:
- A completed nomination form (attached and available at CAS Administrative Gateway)
- A letter of nomination from the department chair or dissertation chair
- An additional faculty letter of recommendation
- The candidate’s brief (no more than 1,000 words) statement describing their research project(s) and how this research will contribute to their respective field or fields
- Curriculum Vitae
- Current transcript (need not be sealed, copy generated from MyUW is fine)
Please email your nomination as a single pdf file to Barbara Mack, barbmack@uw.edu by 8:00 AM on March 16, 2020. We hope to announce the results by May, after review by a faculty committee.
Nominations are now open for the 2020 PAA Annual Awards! Recognize a fellow demographer (or yourself!) who has contributed to the profession. The following four awards will be presented at the PAA 2020 Annual Meeting in Washington, DC. Click on the links below for individual nomination criteria. Deadline is January 31, 2020.
Dorothy S. Thomas Award – presented annually for the best graduate student paper on the interrelationships among social, economic and demographic variables.
Early Achievement Award – given biennially to scholars who have made distinguished contributions to population research during the first ten years after receipt of their Ph.D.
Clifford C. Clogg Award for Mid-Career Achievement – honors outstanding scholarly achievements of a population professional who attained their highest professional degree within the previous 10-20 years.
Mindel C. Sheps Award – given biennially for outstanding contributions to mathematical demography or demographic methodology.
More information about the awards and eligibility criteria is available at this link.
The National Center for Health Statistics announces Call for Abstracts for an Opioid Survey Question Evaluation Symposium in September 2020
The National Center for Health Statistics will host a symposium in Washington, DC in September 2020 focused on empirical evaluation of opioid-use related survey questions. In preparation for this meeting, NCHS seeks input from both federal and non-federal partners to better understand what measures are being used and how those measures have been evaluated for opioid-use related survey questions.
Fully addressing the opioid crisis requires various types of high-quality data, including survey data on opioid use, misuse, disorder and prescription practices. Yet, an inventory of opioid-related questions from various state and federal surveys reveals inconsistent questions, raising concern for construct validity and the comparability of resulting estimates.
In an effort to advance the quality of opioid survey data, the National Center for Health Statistics will bring together subject matter experts and survey methodologists, including federal and non-federal partners, to host a symposium and share information on opioid use-related measures.
The symposium will:
- Assess construct definitions and validity of existing opioid use-related survey questions
- Identify research limitations and gaps in knowledge
- Consider best practices in survey question design for opioid use-related topics
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
Researchers are invited to submit abstracts on the empirical evaluation of opioid use-related survey questions to be presented at the symposium.
Papers will be discussed and then compiled in a published compendium.
Author Guidelines
Papers should pertain to the evaluation of opioid use-related survey questions, including:
- Population-based questions related to opioid-use, impairment, misuse, addiction and disorder
- Healthcare-based questions related to prescription practices, awareness and patient education
The symposium is limited to empirical, science-based question evaluation studies. Qualitative, quantitative as well as mixed-method research designs are sought. Authors should submit an abstract of less than 450 words, including objective, method, results and conclusions.Deadline for abstract submission: March 6, 2020
Notification of acceptance: March 31, 2020
For abstract submission and inquiries regarding the symposium, contact QBank@cdc.gov
IIASA offers a range of postdoc opportunities for early career researchers. These include fully funded research positions of up to two years to study topics related to the IIASA research agenda. Information on call openings and application deadlines can be found in the link below.
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) is the gateway for NIH grant applications and their review for scientific merit. We organize the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (75%) of the research grant applications sent to NIH. We also receive all grant applications for NIH, as well as for some other components of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) is the home to a community of over 240 diverse and accomplished scientists who share a deep commitment to science and health and making sure NIH grant applications are fairly and expertly reviewed. These Scientific Review Officers (SROs) play pivotal roles in ensuring that the NIH peer review process identifies the most promising research grant applications, because the most important factor in determining whether an NIH grant application is funded by NIH is how well it fares in peer review. https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-10/SROJobsFlyer.pdf.
SROs help ensure the vitality of NIH peer review by using their scientific expertise and communication and interpersonal skills to—
- Analyze the scientific content of grant applications,
- Identify the scientists invited to serve on study sections and assign the applications each member will review,
- Organize and run peer-review meetings to assess grant applications,
- Provide applicants with a succinct written summary statement explaining how the review committee viewed the applications.
CSR is actively seeking scientists who combine a broad and current understanding of research in biomedical and behavioral sciences. We are particularly interested in the following specific expertise: Epidemiology, population research, demography, social science, health services research, health informatics, and related fields. Successful candidates will be respected, accomplished scientists with maturity, integrity and outstanding communication skills. Requirements include an M.D. or Ph.D. in the biomedical or behavioral sciences (or equivalent training and experience); American citizenship; and a record of independent research accomplishments, documented by an outstanding publication record and administrative background.
The Center for Scientific Review at the National Institutes of Health invites you to apply for a professional track currently available at CSR. The vacancy announcements can be found through the NIH Recruitment website (www.jobs.nih.gov/globalrecruitment). If interested, please contact Valerie Durrant at durrantv@csr.nih.gov.
Here are the link to the open opportunities which include both DE and MP:
The Russell Sage Foundation (RSF) announced the selection of 17 Visiting Scholars for the 2020-2021 academic year, including CSDE Affiliates Heather D. Hill and Scott W. Allard. While in residence at RSF in New York City, Hill will write a book documenting the experiences of low-wage workers in Seattle during the early twenty-first century as the city experienced rapid population and job growth, skyrocketing costs of living, and a new minimum wage ordinance. Allard will work on several related projects that examine changing geographical trends in poverty and safety net availability across urban, suburban, and rural America. You can read more about the projects and initiatives that Hill and Allard will work on as RSF visiting scholars here.