Russell Sage Foundation: Immigration and Immigrant Integration Research Grants
This initiative seeks to support innovative research on the effects of race, citizenship, legal status and politics, political culture and public policy on outcomes for immigrants and for the native-born of different racial and ethnic groups and generations. This initiative falls under RSF’s Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration Program and represents a special area of interest within the core program, which continues to encourage proposals on a broader set of issues. RSF and the Carnegie Corporation of New York invite proposals for new research that will strengthen the theory, methods and empirical knowledge about the effects of race, citizenship, legal status, and the interplay of politics and policy on immigrant outcomes. Because of limitations in government statistics, researchers are curating and analyzing data from both public and private sources (e.g., specialized surveys, administrative sources from tax, social security and citizenship and immigration services, as well as social media), and collecting their own data to measure the progress of the foreign-born and their children. Many of the questions listed below are difficult to answer because of data limitations (Blau & Mackie, 2016; Duncan & Trejo, 2016; Massey, 2010; Waters & Pineau, 2015) regarding age and time of arrival, time spent in the U.S., legal status at present and upon entry, including visa type, parents’ and grandparents’ place of birth, longitudinal data, and data linked across sources. Thus, we welcome proposals to improve the measurement of immigrant progress over time and across generations. We are especially interested in creative uses of administrative and other data sources that enhance our ability to identify immigrants by generation and legal status. Full details are here [russellsage.org]. Deadline: 1
Russell Sage Foundation Social, Political and Economic Inequality Research Grants
This RSF program supports innovative research on the factors that contribute to social, political, and economic inequalities in the U.S., and the extent to which those inequalities affect social, political, psychological, and economic outcomes such as educational and labor market access and opportunities, social and economic mobility within and across generations, and civic participation and representation. We seek innovative investigator-initiated research that will expand our understanding of social, political, and economic inequalities and the mechanisms by which they influence the lives of individuals, families, and communities. We welcome projects that explore the relevance of economic, racial, ethnic, age, gender, immigration, residence, or other statuses for the distribution of social, political, and economic outcomes within and across different status groups. RSF prioritizes analyses that make use of newly available data or demonstrate novel uses of existing data. We support original data collection when a project is focused on important program priorities, projects that conduct survey or field experiments and qualitative studies. RSF encourages methodological variety and inter-disciplinary collaboration. Proposed projects must have well-developed conceptual frameworks and rigorous research designs. Analytical models must be well-specified and research methods must be appropriate. RSF priorities do not include analyses of health or mental health outcomes or health behaviors as these are priorities for other funders. For the same reason, RSF seldom supports studies focused on educational processes or curricular issues but does prioritize analyses of inequalities in student achievement or educational attainment. Full details are here [russellsage.org]. Deadline: 1
CFComPASS Program Seeks Community Organization Applicants For Health Equity Interventions
Are you an affiliate who works with a community organization that directs health equity interventions? If so, your community organization partner might be a good candidate for the following call for funding. Research organizations can be partners on the grant, but the grant needs to be led by a community organization.
The NIH Common Fund is soliciting applications from community organizations in support of the goals of the Community Partnerships to Advance Science for Society (ComPASS) Program’s [commonfund.nih.gov] Community
- Applicants must be community organizations (non-profits with and without 501(C)(3) IRS Status) defined as a non-Federal, non-academic or non-research organization that provides goods, services, support, resources, or advocacy to members of a defined community. (See “Eligibility” section in the ROA)
- Additionally, applicants must propose at least one potential research organization/research investigator, who has agreed to support and participate in the community organization’s full application. The research organization(s)/research investigator(s) can be academic or non-academic institutions.
- A letter of intent (LOI) is required and due by November 18, 2022, 11:59 PM ET (E-mail LOIs to Dr. Yvonne Owens Ferguson at CFComPASS@od.nih.gov)
- NIH staff will hold technical assistance webinars for the required letter of intent (LOI) on October 4th and October 11th at 2pm-3pm ET. Registration is required.
- To help prepare a LOI for this ROA, applicants are encouraged to watch a pre-recorded technical assistance presentation [gcc02.safelinks.protection.
outlook.com]and view slides [commonfund.nih.gov]. Additionally, answers to Frequently Asked Questions about OTA-22-007 are available on the ComPASS website [commonfund.nih.gov]. - LOIs will be used to select those invited to submit full applications, which will be submitted through the Application Submission System & Interface for Submission Tracking (ASSIST) [public.era.nih.gov] system by January 23, 2023.
Additional background about ComPASS:
The overall goals for ComPASS are to 1) develop, share, and evaluate community-led health equity structural interventions that leverage partnerships across multiple sectors to reduce health disparities and 2) to develop a new health equity research model for community-led, multisectoral structural intervention research across NIH and other federal agencies. The program will enable communities and researchers to work collaboratively as equal partners in all phases of the research process to enhance the quality of interventions and advance health disparities research.
Take note of new CNSTAT NASEM Report on National Data Infrastructure for Social and Behavioral Sciences
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT) have just released a new report on a proposal to build a national data infrastructure for the 21st century. The committee’s goal was to develop a vision for a new, national data infrastructure for the social and behavioral sciences. The report can be found here and there will be celebratory event in Washington, D.C. on October 13 from 2-5pm EST. Register for the event here. Notably several prominent demographers contributed to the report and serve on CNSTAT, including Matthew Snipp (Stanford), Judith Seltzer (UC Irvine), Ann Case (Princeton University), and Robert Groves (Georgetown).
NICHD Announces High Priority Research Areas on the Impact of Policy Changes and Emerging Public Health Crises on NICHD Populations of Interest
This Notice applies to health, development, and well-being outcomes that are within the scientific scope of the NICHD. This Notice does not apply to research on outcomes that are the focus of other NIH Institutes and Centers. Also, because the focus of this Notice is on emerging or evolving public health crises, this Notices does not apply to research on long-term public health issues. Examples of areas not within this scope of this Notice are smoking, cardiovascular disease, substance abuse, and overweight and obesity. While this Notice is primarily focused on policy change and public health crises that are national in scope or, at a minimum, affect a large share of the U.S. population, there is no requirement that research submitted in response to this Notice be national or regional in scope. Research focused on outcomes in specific locations are also permitted if the results can be generalized to the United States overall, a large segment of the U.S. population, a major U.S. subpopulation, or a health disparities population.
High priority areas
- Public health crises and policy changes that have limited windows of opportunity for planning and conducting rigorous research and data collection.
- Expansion of existing research programs that will allow comparisons of pre- and post-event outcomes.
- Outcomes that are national in scope and are focused on the United States.
- Outcomes that are associated with high mortality or morbidity of NICHD populations of interest or that primarily or particularly affect the NICHD populations of interest.
- Research involving underserved and health disparities populations and that addresses the causes, consequences, and reduction of health disparities.
Secondary priority
- Outcomes related to policy change or public health crises that are regional in scope (such as a group of several adjoining or associated U.S. states)
Low priority
- Outcomes that are limited to a geographic or governmental region below the state level.
- Outcomes that primarily affect the elderly or other populations that are not NICHD populations of interest.
- Outcomes that are the focus of other NIH Institutes or Centers.
- Long-term public health issues not related to infectious disease such as obesity and overweight and the opioid epidemic.
NICHD Announces 2 Crowdsourcing Challenges to Advance Maternal Health Research
Check it out – NASEM Panel on Integrated Data for US HH Income, Wealth and Consumption
The third public meeting on an integrated system of US household income, wealth, and consumption data will be held on September 20 from 11am-2pm (PST) via webinar here. This meeting will include presentations from from six countries – Canada, Finland, Italy, U.K., Netherlands, and New Zealand – about their experiences using multiple data sources to create both a data infrastructure for income, consumption and wealth, and improved estimates.
CSDE Welcomes Four New Affiliates!
CSDE’s Executive Committee is pleased to introduce four of our new UW Faculty Affiliates:
- Isabelle Cohen–Assistant Professor, Evans School of Public Policy & Governance. Dr. Cohen’s research focuses on innovations and their potential to change the implementation of governmental and non-governmental activities and services in developing countries, using large-scale randomized control trials to rigorously evaluate new technologies and organizational methods.
- Daniel Enquobahrie—Associate Professor, Epidemiology. Adjunct Associate Professor, Health Systems and Population Health. Dr. Enquobahrie’s research focuses on (1) pre-pregnancy and early/mid pregnancy risk factors (and associated mechanisms) for pregnancy complications and outcomes, and (2) early life and developmental origins of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.
- Laura Evans—Associate Professor, Evans School of Public Policy & Governance. Dr. Evans’ work addresses both historic and continuing obstacles to Native American tribal governments’ exercise of sovereignty and self-determination. She documents how tribes respond to their context in order to dismantle barriers and expand opportunities to self-govern.
- Vedavati Patwardhan—Postdoctoral Scholar, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Dr. Patwardhan is an applied microeconomist, with research interests in development economics and demography. Her research focuses on women’s economic empowerment, maternal and child health, and program evaluation in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.
CSDE Welcomes Professor Jung-Hwa Ha, Visiting Scholar from Seoul National University
This academic year, CSDE is hosting Professor Jung-Hwa Ha from the Department of Social Welfare at Seoul National University in South Korea. Dr. Ha received her Ph.D. in Social Work and Sociology from University of Michigan and her research interests include aging and the life course, widowhood, social support, end-of-life care, and dementia care. She is primarily interested in examining how late-life transitions such as widowhood or a health decline affect older adults’ social and psychological well-being, and the extent to which various social and psychological factors moderate these relationships. She also conducts more practice-oriented research on advance care planning for people with dementia and cross-cultural research comparing the impact of childlessness on older adults’ well-being across different Asian countries with her collaborators. This opportunity was made possibly by CSDE Executive Committee Member Professor Heather Hill and the Evans School. Dr. Ha will be sitting in CSDE, participating in CSDE events, and delivering a seminar lecture this year (stay tuned!). Dr. Ha is looking forward to speaking with any member of the CSDE community who also shares her research interests!